MOOC Aphorisms
During the final week of the "Academia and the MOOC" course that I facilitated, I offered a wiki page for participanys to post a "MOOC aphorism." An aphorism is defined as a short observation that contains a general truth - a one-liner not meant to be funny. These "MOOC aphorisms" were short observations based on the case studies and student experiences about Massive Open Online Courses that people felt contained a general truth.
I can't say that I agree 100% with all these aphorisms, but I would say that any single post had more than one person's support.
We even had one image comment that addresses an entire discussion in the course - defining and redefining a MOOC.
- Not all MOOCs are “massive.” They may contain hundreds to more than a hundred thousand participants.
- “Open” can mean different things, including: open for enrollment, free of cost, using open source products, with content free to reuse.
- Some MOOC courses are not courses in the traditional sense (grades, assignments, testing, credits).
- Providing education for the masses is almost always a good thing, but that doesn't necessarily mean a MOOC should be part of an academic degree
- The disruption of the stable traditional economical model of education has begun. Hybrid inclusion of courses from across the world into students portfolios will increase.
- "The trick is to not feel obligated to answer 400 questions, or even to read them all" - Stephen Downes (May 8, 2013 in a course chat) This is an important MOOC literacy skill for students and faculty.
- Colleges view no-credit as no dollars and will question the dollar value of providing a free educational experience. Business models will, unfortunately, be an important factor in the expansion of MOOCs.
- MOOCs are about learning in a networked world.
- This type of lifelong learning, while structured much like a course, is more of an event around a topic and possibly not connected to a school.
- As of now, MOOCs are self-defined with no real parameters and no evaluation metrics.
- Many of the issues with MOOCs (assessment, integrity, student contact, completion rates, acceptance by schools etc.) have been issues in traditional online courses for at least three decades.
- Much of the language of MOOCs is one of elitist entitlement - "students everywhere deserve my course" - without any validity of quality other than brand name institutions .
- Better to consider some participants as "auditors" rather than "lurkers."
- Students come to MOOCs with different expectations. For example, some seek a portion of the content as resource to use (like a website or enhanced textbook) with some peer support (discussions) but have no intention to use all the content or "complete" the course.
- Unexpected benefits will come from connecting all of these "local" environments with a "global" conversation. That will be some of the payoffs from MOOCs, including the mobile health class just starting with Venture Labs and even the new Buffett-funded Philanthropy MOOCs.
- "Only you can tell in the end if you have been successful - just like in real life." Dave Cormier
- It may turn out that MOOCs are best for lifelong learning, professional development, basic skills/developmental/remedial learning and NOT credit and degree programs.
- The effects of MOOCs are more likely to remain in 20 years than actual MOOCs.
Comments
No comments